In a move making global headlines, the United Arab Emirates announced a major shift toward AI-assisted governance. On April 14, Dubai ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum unveiled plans for a Regulatory Intelligence Office that will use artificial intelligence to suggest legal updates and speed up legislation by as much as 70%.

The initiative- framed as the world’s first of its kind- aims to craft a comprehensive legislative plan integrating local and federal law, judicial systems, administrative bodies, and global policy trends. It also promises interactive public platforms for legislative feedback.

However, observers are urging caution.

Not a World First, But a Global Shift
AI-written law isn’t entirely new. In 2023, Porto Alegre, Brazil, passed a local ordinance partially drafted by ChatGPT-though the AI’s involvement wasn’t disclosed until after the vote. Across the world, lawmakers have increasingly experimented with AI for drafting, research, and legislative analysis.

The UAE’s approach stands out in its scale and systemization, backed by a $3 billion pledge to become an “AI-native government” by 2027. While critics express concerns about errors, bias, or a lack of human empathy in AI-written law, proponents note these issues aren’t unique to machines-humans have long made legislative mistakes with serious consequences.

The Real Risk: Concentration of Power
Analysts argue that AI’s true risk lies not in malfunction, but in manipulation. In authoritarian states, AI could enable powerful actors to fast-track complex laws tailored to specific interests. The potential for “microlegislation”– tiny, often hidden legal loopholes- could expand exponentially, making oversight even more difficult.

In the UAE, where legislative authority lies with unelected rulers, this raises concern about transparency and accountability. As political scientist Amy McKay warns, AI could become a powerful tool for quietly embedding special-interest agendas.

A Tool for Inclusion- If Used Right
Despite the risks, experts agree that AI can also be a force for democratic participation, if designed to listen and empower. Countries like Taiwan, France, Scotland, and parts of the U.S. are testing AI-driven platforms that gather public input on legislation and improve civic dialogue.

If the UAE follows through on its promise of interactive policymaking tools, it could open a door to greater citizen involvement- though meaningful public input will depend on transparency, freedom of expression, and civil protections.

As one analyst put it, “AI won’t depoliticize law; it will amplify whoever controls it.” The question remains: Will the UAE’s AI law project reflect its people’s needs, or consolidate control?